<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: python scripting in gdb!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bauermann.eng.br/2008/03/14/python-scripting-in-gdb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bauermann.eng.br/2008/03/14/python-scripting-in-gdb/</link>
	<description>incomplete and abridged</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 06:36:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bauermann</title>
		<link>http://blog.bauermann.eng.br/2008/03/14/python-scripting-in-gdb/#comment-2342</link>
		<dc:creator>bauermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bauermann.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-2342</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s not true that GDB copied the idea from ZeroBUGS. If you look at the mailing list archives in early 2007 you&#039;ll see that ZeroBUGS was not mentioned at all when discussions were held to select which scripting language GDB should support. Nor any other debugger was mentioned, if I recall correctly. The discussion was focused on merits of the scripting languages being considered, not on features from other debuggers. You should not make these accusations without any base.

But it&#039;s true that GDB is lagging behind from other debuggers in terms of features. Lately, the GDB community has been regaining development speed, so perhaps we can catch up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s not true that GDB copied the idea from ZeroBUGS. If you look at the mailing list archives in early 2007 you&#8217;ll see that ZeroBUGS was not mentioned at all when discussions were held to select which scripting language GDB should support. Nor any other debugger was mentioned, if I recall correctly. The discussion was focused on merits of the scripting languages being considered, not on features from other debuggers. You should not make these accusations without any base.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s true that GDB is lagging behind from other debuggers in terms of features. Lately, the GDB community has been regaining development speed, so perhaps we can catch up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristian Vlasceanu</title>
		<link>http://blog.bauermann.eng.br/2008/03/14/python-scripting-in-gdb/#comment-2331</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristian Vlasceanu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 20:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bauermann.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-2331</guid>
		<description>The ZeroBUGS debugger has introduced Python scripting some two years ago!

This shows one more time that the Open Source community copies ideas from others more often than invent new stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ZeroBUGS debugger has introduced Python scripting some two years ago!</p>
<p>This shows one more time that the Open Source community copies ideas from others more often than invent new stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yoyoyohey</title>
		<link>http://blog.bauermann.eng.br/2008/03/14/python-scripting-in-gdb/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>yoyoyohey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bauermann.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-227</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this page!  It continues to be about the best Google-facing page to find the links to this project.  Actually, rhetorical question, is this the same project as PythonGDB at http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/PythonGdb

...that page contains no links to the git repo, from what I can tell.  A search for PythonGDB brings up nothing useful for that page.  A search for gdb-python brings up the git repo, at least.  This is an extraordinarily interesting project, but you guys need to do some PR work. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this page!  It continues to be about the best Google-facing page to find the links to this project.  Actually, rhetorical question, is this the same project as PythonGDB at <a href="http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/PythonGdb" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/PythonGdb</a></p>
<p>&#8230;that page contains no links to the git repo, from what I can tell.  A search for PythonGDB brings up nothing useful for that page.  A search for gdb-python brings up the git repo, at least.  This is an extraordinarily interesting project, but you guys need to do some PR work. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GCC Summit 2008 &#171; bauermann</title>
		<link>http://blog.bauermann.eng.br/2008/03/14/python-scripting-in-gdb/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>GCC Summit 2008 &#171; bauermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bauermann.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-203</guid>
		<description>[...] not much, but still&#8230;) and am at least partially involved in a few current GDB developments (python scripting and reversible [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not much, but still&#8230;) and am at least partially involved in a few current GDB developments (python scripting and reversible [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: breaking code into reviewable patches &#171; bauermann</title>
		<link>http://blog.bauermann.eng.br/2008/03/14/python-scripting-in-gdb/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>breaking code into reviewable patches &#171; bauermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 04:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bauermann.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-76</guid>
		<description>[...] Abril 30, 2008 de bauermann    As I mentioned before, I&#8217;ve been working on and off on adding Python scripting support to GDB, with Tom Tromey and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Abril 30, 2008 de bauermann    As I mentioned before, I&#8217;ve been working on and off on adding Python scripting support to GDB, with Tom Tromey and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarlosCosta.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Debugar scripts Python no GDB: Agora vai!</title>
		<link>http://blog.bauermann.eng.br/2008/03/14/python-scripting-in-gdb/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>CarlosCosta.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Debugar scripts Python no GDB: Agora vai!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bauermann.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-61</guid>
		<description>[...] notícia veio do Bauermann e seu anúncio da novidade pode ser lido diretamente na lista do gdb neste [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] notícia veio do Bauermann e seu anúncio da novidade pode ser lido diretamente na lista do gdb neste [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Costa</title>
		<link>http://blog.bauermann.eng.br/2008/03/14/python-scripting-in-gdb/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bauermann.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Seems interesting for me... I &#039;ll follow the discussion and maybe contribute with, thanks ;-)

[ ]s
Carlos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems interesting for me&#8230; I &#8216;ll follow the discussion and maybe contribute with, thanks <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>[ ]s<br />
Carlos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
